On the Death of Siegfried Lenz ? ?You have to justify your life?

Siegfried Lenz, one of the great writers of German post-war literature is dead. He died on 7 October 2014, surrounded by his family. He was 88 years old.... more more

GoetheInstitute

23/05/2005

Google Print, or knowledge is power

By Rüdiger Wischenbart

This is one of those convoluted issues where one group wants to make the world a better place, challenged by others with undoubtedly convincing arguments.

It involves no less than the dream of all librarians since the creation of the Alexandria repository in Ancient Egypt, i.e. of accumulating all knowledge available in the world and arranging it in a convenient system to make it accessible at any time - "at any time" today meaning at the click of a mouse, without delay and from anywhere in the world.

Google, the California-based Internet search engine whose immodest mission is "to organize the world’s information", wants to make this a reality, extending its scope far beyond the realms of the Internet. In addition to websites, its Google Print project will aim to provide direct online access to books and entire libraries.

With around 200 million dollars from last year’s stock market flotation at its disposal, the company is employing a bold, twin-pronged strategy. On the one hand, it will negotiate the right to scan new publications and make them available to Internet users via search functions. The incentive for publishers is the sales boost these searches will provide – free of charge. Google’s system allows users to view between 20% and 100% of book contents – although without the option (for copyright reasons) of printing them out.

Meanwhile, Google has enlisted a handful of English-language libraries, including the New York Public Library, Harvard University, Stanford and the Bodleian in Oxford, to allow the complete digitisation of a total of 15 million (largely older) books from their collections.

A hint of this vision, although essentially still in test-tube form, can already be gleaned from A9, the experimental platform of Google’s rival and potential partner, online book retailer Amazon. Linking Google’s technology with Amazon’s "Search Inside the Book" function, this already promising search engine shows how extensive but detailed searches can be performed on books, images and websites via a – albeit still rather small and English-language-only – catalogue.

Now Google is starting to expand its Print project to incorporate Europe and its various languages. It is promoting its plans at all major book fairs and contacting publishers. But rather than receiving widespread approval, the utopia of knowledge for all has raised a widespread outcry, with its starting point in France.

Absurd? Not entirely.

The underlying principles are straightforward enough. Anyone who, like Google, intends to "organize the world’s knowledge" will accumulate considerable power in an information society. The notion that a single machine, a company or an algorithm is able to organise all freely available knowledge in a position of overwhelming dominance is hard to reconcile with the principles of cultural diversity.

Since launching his campaign a few months ago, Jean-Noël Jeanneney, President of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, has been lobbying colleagues and politicians for a rival European project. Nineteen national libraries across the continent, including those in Germany and Austria, have followed the appeal to create a European digital library to compete with the "American" Google project.

The calls were echoed at the highest political level two weeks ago in the extremely apt setting of Paris’s Comédie Française, where the European Commission pledged an initial package of funds to provide a rapid and resolute response under the banner of cultural diversity – in the form of a European project – to thwart American dominance. Nonetheless, the European rearguard action launched against Californian Google supremos Larry Page and Sergey Brin has not proved a genuinely promising strategy.

The Google Print project has seen the emergence of considerable problems, not just regarding the political issue of cultural dominance. It remains utterly unclear, for example, whether publishing houses control the rights that they are to transfer to Google. As things are, Google covers all the costs and requests only very limited rights of disposal, leaving publishers to deal with all the complicated legal issues. Google claims it’s merely doing the marketing for the books. Where authors protest, they settle their grievances with their publisher. Google’s role is limited to offering to remove the title from the list.

These days, the prevailing idea with websites is that they ultimately only exist if they are easy to find via Google. If Google Print succeeds, it will pose competition to existing catalogues of books still in print by compiling a global super catalogue, after which books – i.e. knowledge in general – will also await the same fate. That’s power.

A passage in the agreement offered to publishers illustrates the fact that Google Print does more than just tasteful advertising for books. Google posts its patented and very successful little ad banner on sites featuring particular books, as it has traditionally done with websites, and is looking to share the resulting revenues with publishers. Its offer is likely to give rise to major conflicts of interest between publishers, who want to maintain control of their catalogues and channels of distribution, the authors, who demand advertising for their books, and the publishing industry, especially independent retailers and online booksellers. This does not comprise a minor tremor, but tectonic shifts that send a shudder through the foundations of the arts and their commercial structure.

If the European Union now intends to create its own Google Print, unfortunate timing and the lack of a clear-cut perspective could see it embroiled in an atmosphere already agitated by the ongoing debate on updating copyright law. After all, the practical and legal problems would be no different were the instigator of the project from the EU, and not a company from Mountain View, California. In any case, in the past there have been numerous cases of national pride not always proving to be the best and most innovative master planner when it comes to competing with highly innovative private enterprises.

The example of France’s new-look Bibliothèque Nationale, with its highly ambitious aims which also include the digitisation and dissemination of all knowledge, should serve as a warning. The catalogue of digital archives appealingly titled Gallica currently boasts a rather meagre 80,000 titles. Many of these are scanned using outdated technical standards, i.e. as images and as such invisible to full text searches. Gallica is dead on delivery. What’s more, 80,000 titles are already far less than the more than 100,000 publications held online by Amazon today in the word-by-word "Search Inside the Book" function referred to above.

The relative conditions in which Google and its future European counterpart work appear all the more absurd on closer observation. At the European summit two weeks ago, the EU’s Information Society and Media Commissioner Viviane Reding pledged 36 million euros towards the development of a European search engine, and a further 60 million for digitisation. In light of Google’s allocation of 200 million alone for digitising library collections, and bearing in mind its established technology and existing global market presence, the chances of the European challenge succeeding at this level do not appear particularly good.

That said, money is not the only issue here. Despite the billions in its war chests, Microsoft has likewise so far proved unable to crack Google. The possible causes of this were recently explained in US business journal Fortune. Google remains impregnable because it that runs on different operating systems, can be used free of charge and therefore cannot be undercut, and earns its money with advertisements whose very omnipresence makes them so effective. Every website can sign up to the system.

In short, Google prospers by being a node that links so many users. Everybody searches in Google, and for that very reason everyone also wants others to be able to find them there.

On the other hand, however, Google has long since stopped being the “open”, all-smiles platform suggested by its logo and image. This is unmistakeably clear in the agreements that Google is proposing to its publishing partners for access to titles. These are subject to US law and can only be contested at a court in California – a far from promising outlook for a small or medium-sized publisher somewhere in Europe, and certainly not an ideal basis for the "organisation of the world’s knowledge."

A library project strictly limited to English-speaking institutions is equally unacceptable, even if their shelves, of course, include countless volumes in many different languages.

If, as mentioned, Google derives its strength from everybody wanting to be involved, then this provides a far broader front for Europe to launch an offensive strategy than the construction of some sort of rival product. Europe should employ all (political) means at its disposal to insist it also has a role in shaping the rules for the development of any comprehensive library of the future.

The range of demands involved here would first have to be compiled in the form of a long list. This would range from the European place of jurisdiction for Continental publishing partners to a joint declaration of principle from Google and the European Union relating to open and free-of-charge access (both now and in the long term) to resources indexed via the search engine. It would also include the expansion of the knowledge resources to be digitised and indexed to include a broad-based European catalogue of libraries – for which substantial European funding would then be certain to flow. (Just a point here, although it is one of far-reaching consequences. the European Commission currently spends a lot of money to ensure easier access to public sector information. Should not the latter, in particular, also be incorporated in an initiative of this kind?)

In political terms, a successful example of French stubbornness on the cultural front dating back two decades could in fact serve as a model. Back then, France resisted the global liberalisation of trade foreseen in the GATT agreement in order to insist on its "exception culturelle" – the view that cultural assets should be treated separately. The arts programmes established at the time had considerable influence on the promotion of cultural diversity in Europe, from cinema and music to regional culture, benefiting both the culture industry and creative individuals.

The clock is ticking. Google’s Larry Page and Sergey Brin have once before demonstrated how to shake up the competition with verve and drive. The immense challenge posed today by Google Print and a number of related projects certainly justifies the high hopes placed in the European response. The answer to a wheel that has suddenly picked up speed cannot be, however, to reinvent it just by giving it a European hub. The better response would be to get a hand on the steering.

*

The article was originally published in German in Perlentaucher on 17 May, 2005.

Rüdiger Wischenbart is a consultant and freelance journalist covering the arts and media.

Translation: Francis Lee.

Get the signandsight newsletter for regular updates on feature articles.
signandsight.com - let's talk european.

 
More articles

Signandsight.com says good-bye

Wednesday March 28, 2012

Signandsight.com bids farewell after seven exciting and engaging years. Editors Thierry Chervel and Anja Seeliger express their thanks and say a personal good-bye to our readers - while remaining committed to the idea of a public forum dedicated to the motto "Let's Talk European".
read more

"We only have ourselves to draw upon"

Wednesday 26 October, 2011

TeaserPicIf geniuses still exist in Germany, then Friedrich Kittler, who died at the age of 68 on 18 October, was one of them. The literary scholar and media theorist wrote as much about drugs as he did about weapons, and he was as interested in war as he was in love. One of his PhD students is a Eurofighter pilot in Afghanistan. Andreas Rosenfelder talked with him in his Berlin apartment at the beginning of the year.
read more

Surveillance on demand

Monday 17 October 2011

The Chaos Computer Club's sensational find of a German government trojan has shed light on an extreme case of state surveillance. Spokespersons of the club, Constanze Kurz and Frank Rieger suggest that this is not an isolated case of enforcement overstepping the limits of the law. In an interview with Joachim Güntner they talk about the promise of efficiency, the antagonism of freedom and security, and the society of digital control.
read more

Signandsight revisited

Wednesday 23 March, 2011

We're extremely pleased to be back, after a bout of financial flu, buoyed up by your many mails of encouragement! The new streamlined signandsight.com will no longer deliver feuilleton or magazine summaries, concentrating on getting you full translations every week instead. Please follow us on Twitter and eventually Facebook too!
read more

Against obscurantism

Tuesday 2 November, 2010

TeaserPicTwo years ago Argentinian philosophy professor Horacio Potel was taken to court for running three non-profit online Spanish libraries featuring hitherto unavailable texts by Heidegger, Derrida and Nietzsche. He talks to Beatriz Busaniche about his country's draconian copyright laws and the vital importance of free access to our common heritage.
read more

Open Excess

Tuesday 26 May, 2009

As the world awaits the decision on the Google Books Settlement, there is much uncertainty and debate about what it will mean for authors' rights. In Germany, literature professor Roland Reuß has added to the confusion by launching an attack on what he believes to be another enemy of the freedom to publish: Open Access. Publishers, journalists, authors and other sympathisers have signed his petition, which is now in the hands of Chancellor Merkel. Their arguments are hair-raising, deluded and dangerous, says Matthias Spielkamp
read more

The fuel of the Internet

Thursday 3 January, 2008

Give me back my hierarchical media system! Print journalists live in fear of the death of "good journalism" through Web 2.0 and yet a blogger was nominated Germany's journalist of 2007. While the discourse rumbles on Google is noiselessly earning 3 euros a month from millions of German users. By Robin Meyer-Lucht
read more

From closed circuits to communicating tubes

Monday 18 June, 2007

European democracy exists largely within nation-states, and not in the continental dimension. Even the ponderous TV channel "Euro-News" has not succeeded in creating a European public sphere. But without a European consciousness there will be no European federation. For this to happen interpreters are needed, to explain the motives of one side to the other. By Adam Krzeminski
read more

How to save the quality press?

Monday 21 May, 2007

When gas, electricity or water are at stake, the state must guarantee the energy supply for the population. Shouldn't it do likewise when the other type of 'energy' is at risk, the quality press? All over the world, financial investors are increasingly replacing patriarchal publishers and imposing their idea of profitability. Philosopher Jürgen Habermas argues for state support for the quality newspapers.
read more

The press and Europe's public sphere

Thursday 9 May, 2007

Newspapers by nature cover local matters. That belongs to the rules of the game. But what happens when the rules change? Only when they take an active interest in affairs abroad will paper's coverage on their home turf improve. Arne Ruth, long-time chief editor of Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, tells why cross-border journalism can help make the separate realms of Europe a single public space.
read more

Cultural diversity? A pipe dream

Thursday 22 March, 2007

The UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions entered into force on March 18. Rüdiger Wischenbart gives a quick overview of the realities behind translation.
read more

Knowledge and its price

Thursday 6 July, 2006

We live in a knowledge society, but it knows very little about itself. Information technologies allow us to organise knowledge faster than ever, yet we are regularly warned that we are losing touch with knowledge. The total of all stored knowledge is an exotic 5 exabytes, but a closer look reveals a network of one-way streets, detours, and barred routes. By Rüdiger Wischenbart
read more

The future of journalism

Wednesday 17 May, 2006

Crisis is nothing new to the press. Newspapers will continue to exist, alongside the Internet, soon in paperless form. They must offer their readers exclusive news, bold opinion and captivating language. Mathias Döpfner, head of the Axel Springer media empire, answers Rupert Murdoch.
read more

The medium is English

Monday 15 May, 2006

Are there British intellectuals? Are they better than the rest? Or do they just happen to be speaking the right language at the right time in the history of public debate? By Naomi buck
read more

Prospect's blunder

Monday 10 October, 2005

Prospect magazine's list of the world's top 100 public intellectuals speaks tellingly about the provincialism of today's global media, but says nothing about the ideas behind today's global world. By Arno Widmann
read more