
Dramaturgie im zeitgenössischen Tanz ist ? positiv gemeint ? ein heißes Eisen. Idealerweise sind Dramaturginnen und Dramaturgen während der Erarbeitung eines Stücks die besten Freunde der Choreografen. more
 more

 Is
globalisation levelling out cultural differences? Or should we draw the
line and reject everything that comes from the West? Nonsense, says the
Slovenian poet and cultural critic Ales Debeljak (here in English):
"Instead of subscribing to the ideology that views the world through
the 'hard' lens of conflict between 'the West and the Rest', let us try
a theory that looks at the world through the 'soft' lens of 'westernistic'
civilization. An analogy between Hellenistic and westernistic
civilization is helpful. [...] The Hellenistic civilization of
Alexander the Great emanated from classical Greek heritage, but
territorially it stretched across the entire world then known to man,
reaching to Egypt and India, Tajikistan and Afghanistan. ... A special
fusion of Middle Eastern and Indo-Iranian cultural traditions on the
one hand, and ancient Greek tradition on the other, gave rise to forms
of collective life in which classical Greek ideas represented only the
backbone rather than the entire social body. Alexander the Great
systematically expanded both the borders of his multi-national empire
and the minds of his multi-cultural subjects. He encouraged 'mixed marriages' between Greek colonists and locals with the same fervour that he supported merging of Greek and local ideas and technologies."
Is
globalisation levelling out cultural differences? Or should we draw the
line and reject everything that comes from the West? Nonsense, says the
Slovenian poet and cultural critic Ales Debeljak (here in English):
"Instead of subscribing to the ideology that views the world through
the 'hard' lens of conflict between 'the West and the Rest', let us try
a theory that looks at the world through the 'soft' lens of 'westernistic'
civilization. An analogy between Hellenistic and westernistic
civilization is helpful. [...] The Hellenistic civilization of
Alexander the Great emanated from classical Greek heritage, but
territorially it stretched across the entire world then known to man,
reaching to Egypt and India, Tajikistan and Afghanistan. ... A special
fusion of Middle Eastern and Indo-Iranian cultural traditions on the
one hand, and ancient Greek tradition on the other, gave rise to forms
of collective life in which classical Greek ideas represented only the
backbone rather than the entire social body. Alexander the Great
systematically expanded both the borders of his multi-national empire
and the minds of his multi-cultural subjects. He encouraged 'mixed marriages' between Greek colonists and locals with the same fervour that he supported merging of Greek and local ideas and technologies." Natasha Wimmer portrays the Salvadorian author Horacio Castellanos Moya, a friend of Roberto Bolano's, who has his own way of dealing with the cruel reality of Latin America: "The civil war, which ended in 1992, shaped Castellanos Moya's life and his fiction, but it never seems to have conquered his imagination. Though most of his novels (there are now nine) revolve in some way around the war and its aftereffects, Castellanos Moya never assimilates or romanticizes the culture of violence, never loses his hyper-awareness of its strangeness. As a writer, he is at once highly sensitive to brutality and unsentimental about it. In the brilliantly funny and unsettling 'Senselessness', which in 2008 became his first novel to be translated into English, the narrator is a writer who has taken a job copy-editing an eleven-hundred-page human rights report on the massacre of Indians during the civil war in an unnamed Central American country, and who finds himself struck by the strange beauty of the language in which the victims describe the violence of their aggressors. The phrases he copies down migrate into his banal accounts of office politics and failed seductions, until gradually the horrors that the Indians describe leak into his consciousness and turn what was a mild case of the jitters into raging paranoia."
Natasha Wimmer portrays the Salvadorian author Horacio Castellanos Moya, a friend of Roberto Bolano's, who has his own way of dealing with the cruel reality of Latin America: "The civil war, which ended in 1992, shaped Castellanos Moya's life and his fiction, but it never seems to have conquered his imagination. Though most of his novels (there are now nine) revolve in some way around the war and its aftereffects, Castellanos Moya never assimilates or romanticizes the culture of violence, never loses his hyper-awareness of its strangeness. As a writer, he is at once highly sensitive to brutality and unsentimental about it. In the brilliantly funny and unsettling 'Senselessness', which in 2008 became his first novel to be translated into English, the narrator is a writer who has taken a job copy-editing an eleven-hundred-page human rights report on the massacre of Indians during the civil war in an unnamed Central American country, and who finds himself struck by the strange beauty of the language in which the victims describe the violence of their aggressors. The phrases he copies down migrate into his banal accounts of office politics and failed seductions, until gradually the horrors that the Indians describe leak into his consciousness and turn what was a mild case of the jitters into raging paranoia." As the debate over Imre Kertesz's interview in Die Welt spirals out of control, the writer Laszlo Darvasi points
to a failure to get to the crux of the matter. "Of course a Nobel laureate must expect his words to
engender countless interpretations, commentaries and footnotes. But is
that a normal reaction? Is it normal for such words to provoke an
emotional reaction in the 'entire community'? Is it normal that the
words of a Nobel laureate will affect the entire writing community,
even society as a whole, teachers, porters, fishermen and parking
attendants, just because a Nobel laureate is a 'representative figure'
and the country and we in it seem more important through the eyes of a Nobel laureate? Really? [...] Everything that Kertesz stands for is about not complying
with representative expectations. And he is not complying with them
now. Does it not make a lot more sense to view Kertesz, in spite of his
words, as a free writer who is responsible only for himself, and to
allow him a writer's existence based on normal circumstances,
which is the right of any artist? Not to see him as an immovable fixed
point, but as a living, problematic figure?"
As the debate over Imre Kertesz's interview in Die Welt spirals out of control, the writer Laszlo Darvasi points
to a failure to get to the crux of the matter. "Of course a Nobel laureate must expect his words to
engender countless interpretations, commentaries and footnotes. But is
that a normal reaction? Is it normal for such words to provoke an
emotional reaction in the 'entire community'? Is it normal that the
words of a Nobel laureate will affect the entire writing community,
even society as a whole, teachers, porters, fishermen and parking
attendants, just because a Nobel laureate is a 'representative figure'
and the country and we in it seem more important through the eyes of a Nobel laureate? Really? [...] Everything that Kertesz stands for is about not complying
with representative expectations. And he is not complying with them
now. Does it not make a lot more sense to view Kertesz, in spite of his
words, as a free writer who is responsible only for himself, and to
allow him a writer's existence based on normal circumstances,
which is the right of any artist? Not to see him as an immovable fixed
point, but as a living, problematic figure?"
 The Polish are a neurotic lot, writes Joanna Podgorska (here in German),
with a generally positive view of themselves and a deep mistrust of
everyone else. "In a study carried out in 2007 by Piotr Radkiewicz and
Krystyna Skarzynska, almost 70 percent of Polish people said they were
satisfied with their lives, and 90 percent said it was important to be vigilant against deception;
84 percent were convinced that society is full of people ready to
attack others for no reason, out of pure malice. Over 60 percent agreed
that, as the years go by, fewer people deserve respect, and that there
are increasing numbers of people with no moral backbone, who represent
a threat to others. According to this survey, we feel comfortable living in hell. Where does this schizophrenia come from?"
The Polish are a neurotic lot, writes Joanna Podgorska (here in German),
with a generally positive view of themselves and a deep mistrust of
everyone else. "In a study carried out in 2007 by Piotr Radkiewicz and
Krystyna Skarzynska, almost 70 percent of Polish people said they were
satisfied with their lives, and 90 percent said it was important to be vigilant against deception;
84 percent were convinced that society is full of people ready to
attack others for no reason, out of pure malice. Over 60 percent agreed
that, as the years go by, fewer people deserve respect, and that there
are increasing numbers of people with no moral backbone, who represent
a threat to others. According to this survey, we feel comfortable living in hell. Where does this schizophrenia come from?" Historian of ideas Michel Winock outlines his misgivings about the French debate on "national identity" that was the brain child of Nicolas Sarkozy and which is being carefully watched over by integration minister Eric Besson: "A deeply suspect
debate. Is the idea to define 'identity', so that it can serve as a
role model for new immigrants to France, or it is meant to protect
against them? National identity cannot be decreed. If the state pokes
its nose in here, surely it will only be to be to draw normative
conclusions, in order to define a sort of quintessence of Frenchness, that will be used to distinguish between good and bad French people?"
Historian of ideas Michel Winock outlines his misgivings about the French debate on "national identity" that was the brain child of Nicolas Sarkozy and which is being carefully watched over by integration minister Eric Besson: "A deeply suspect
debate. Is the idea to define 'identity', so that it can serve as a
role model for new immigrants to France, or it is meant to protect
against them? National identity cannot be decreed. If the state pokes
its nose in here, surely it will only be to be to draw normative
conclusions, in order to define a sort of quintessence of Frenchness, that will be used to distinguish between good and bad French people?" The
art market boom is over for now, but you could hardly call it a crash.
This, at least, is the conclusion of a sweeping study, which The Economist presents in detail: "The World Wealth Report,
published by Capgemini and Merrill Lynch, charts the spending habits of
the rich the world over. It includes art as one of a range of luxury
items they like to buy. According to the report, in 2007 there were
over 10m people with investible assets of 1m dollars or more. Last year
that number dropped to 8.6m and many rich people scaled back their 'investments of passion'—yachts,
jets, cars, jewellery and so on. But the proportion of all luxury
spending that went on art increased as investors looked for assets that
would hold their value in the longer term."
The
art market boom is over for now, but you could hardly call it a crash.
This, at least, is the conclusion of a sweeping study, which The Economist presents in detail: "The World Wealth Report,
published by Capgemini and Merrill Lynch, charts the spending habits of
the rich the world over. It includes art as one of a range of luxury
items they like to buy. According to the report, in 2007 there were
over 10m people with investible assets of 1m dollars or more. Last year
that number dropped to 8.6m and many rich people scaled back their 'investments of passion'—yachts,
jets, cars, jewellery and so on. But the proportion of all luxury
spending that went on art increased as investors looked for assets that
would hold their value in the longer term." Umberto Eco is no Bible basher but, he asks,
if you can't tell your Moses from your Matthew, how will you cope in a
museum? "Three-quarters of western art is completely indecipherable to
someone with no idea of what happened in the Old and New Testaments and
in the history of the saints. Who's that woman with the eyeballs on a plate? Is she from Night of the Living Dead? And that knight
tearing his coat in half, is he on some anti-Armani mission? In plenty
of cultural situations, school kids learn everything about the death of
Hector, but nothing about the death of St. Sebastian; everything, perhaps, about the marriage of Cadmus and Harmonia
and nothing about the marriage at Cana? In his some countries, there is
a strong tradition of reading the scriptures and the children know all
about the golden calf but nothing about the wolf of Francis of Assisi." Lucky we've go the Internet then, eh?
Umberto Eco is no Bible basher but, he asks,
if you can't tell your Moses from your Matthew, how will you cope in a
museum? "Three-quarters of western art is completely indecipherable to
someone with no idea of what happened in the Old and New Testaments and
in the history of the saints. Who's that woman with the eyeballs on a plate? Is she from Night of the Living Dead? And that knight
tearing his coat in half, is he on some anti-Armani mission? In plenty
of cultural situations, school kids learn everything about the death of
Hector, but nothing about the death of St. Sebastian; everything, perhaps, about the marriage of Cadmus and Harmonia
and nothing about the marriage at Cana? In his some countries, there is
a strong tradition of reading the scriptures and the children know all
about the golden calf but nothing about the wolf of Francis of Assisi." Lucky we've go the Internet then, eh? The USA might not be as European as Sweden, but it can offer the UK, Italy and France a run for their money, writes the historian Peter Baldwin, and dispels a number of cliches about social spending, criminality, religion and education. "Simone de Beauvoir
was convinced that since the Americans do not think, they do not need
to read. Thinking is difficult to quantify, and reading, even less so.
And the Americans, it emerges, do read. The percentage of illiterate
Americans corresponds to the European average. There are more newspapers per capita
in America than anywhere in Europe, with the exception of the
Scandinavian countries, Switzerland and Luxembourg. The long tradition
of well financed public libraries in the United States has left the
average American with more with books than their counterparts in
Germany, England, France, the Netherlands, Austria and all
Mediterranean countries. They also use the libraries more than most
Europeans."
The USA might not be as European as Sweden, but it can offer the UK, Italy and France a run for their money, writes the historian Peter Baldwin, and dispels a number of cliches about social spending, criminality, religion and education. "Simone de Beauvoir
was convinced that since the Americans do not think, they do not need
to read. Thinking is difficult to quantify, and reading, even less so.
And the Americans, it emerges, do read. The percentage of illiterate
Americans corresponds to the European average. There are more newspapers per capita
in America than anywhere in Europe, with the exception of the
Scandinavian countries, Switzerland and Luxembourg. The long tradition
of well financed public libraries in the United States has left the
average American with more with books than their counterparts in
Germany, England, France, the Netherlands, Austria and all
Mediterranean countries. They also use the libraries more than most
Europeans." America's best reporter Seymour Hersh talks in an interview about the pitfalls of investigative journalism, such as the dangers of quoting unnamed sources
or what he describes, later on in the article, as a "higher-level
former senior intelligence official": "I hate that. Therefore, the way
in my own mind that I cope with that anomaly, that disgrace, if you
will, is that I say I welcome people suing me. I've been in a
lot of litigation. I welcome that on the grounds that it is an
appropriate measure. I think I've been in seven. We were in court once
and the critical issue was that the judge was going to make me reveal
my sources. I was going to have to say that we conceded the point and
be found guilty of libel. The judge was a Reagan appointee in
Chicago a couple of decades ago, and the Reagan appointee ruled that I
didn't have to name sources. I went on camera and we went to the judge,
and we gave an account of six people and gave a description of them,
and the judge accepted that they were real -- that I was serious and I
had sources. But if he hadn't, I think I would have had to concede the
case."
America's best reporter Seymour Hersh talks in an interview about the pitfalls of investigative journalism, such as the dangers of quoting unnamed sources
or what he describes, later on in the article, as a "higher-level
former senior intelligence official": "I hate that. Therefore, the way
in my own mind that I cope with that anomaly, that disgrace, if you
will, is that I say I welcome people suing me. I've been in a
lot of litigation. I welcome that on the grounds that it is an
appropriate measure. I think I've been in seven. We were in court once
and the critical issue was that the judge was going to make me reveal
my sources. I was going to have to say that we conceded the point and
be found guilty of libel. The judge was a Reagan appointee in
Chicago a couple of decades ago, and the Reagan appointee ruled that I
didn't have to name sources. I went on camera and we went to the judge,
and we gave an account of six people and gave a description of them,
and the judge accepted that they were real -- that I was serious and I
had sources. But if he hadn't, I think I would have had to concede the
case." People
no longer trust their governments, the average citizen and his
aristocratic leader are growing ever further apart, and the power of democracy in Europe is waning. One reason for this, according to journalist Robert Friss,
lies in the outmoded European model of the nation state, and the
increasing contempt of the citizens for its representatives. "If the
European community doesn't want to be increasingly sidelined, it must
do away with the divisive romanticism of the nation state. The
first step is to strengthen European awareness and wave goodbye to the
omnipotence of the domineering nation state. Consideration must be
given to the formation of a delicate balance between the freedoms and
the guaranteed quality of life, not of the national but of the European
citizen; and decisions must be made on jurisdiction at collective,
member-state and regional levels. There is no role model here:
Europe has to create its very own, new and efficient political
structure, which allows and also controls the free flow of capital.
People
no longer trust their governments, the average citizen and his
aristocratic leader are growing ever further apart, and the power of democracy in Europe is waning. One reason for this, according to journalist Robert Friss,
lies in the outmoded European model of the nation state, and the
increasing contempt of the citizens for its representatives. "If the
European community doesn't want to be increasingly sidelined, it must
do away with the divisive romanticism of the nation state. The
first step is to strengthen European awareness and wave goodbye to the
omnipotence of the domineering nation state. Consideration must be
given to the formation of a delicate balance between the freedoms and
the guaranteed quality of life, not of the national but of the European
citizen; and decisions must be made on jurisdiction at collective,
member-state and regional levels. There is no role model here:
Europe has to create its very own, new and efficient political
structure, which allows and also controls the free flow of capital. Namrata Joshi describes the huge Arab interest in the Indian terror films  - Kabir Khan's "New York", Jai Tank's "Madholal Keep Walking" and Dr Biju's "Raman, Travelogue of Invasion" - which were screened at the film festival in Cairo. Although this also unleashed a storm of pirate copies, Director Kabir Khan is unperturbed. "Despite grossing US 1.5 million dollars at the box office, 'New York' is estimated to have lost close to a million dollars to piracy in the Middle East. But its success could open up newer markets for Indian films. 'We have managed to make inroads into territories where our films don't get released theatrically,' says Kabir. Yashraj has been approached by Arab distributors for theatrical and television rights of New York in Egypt and Morocco. Karan Johar's forthcoming film, 'My Name is Khan', which is being distributed worldwide by Fox, will also get released in Cairo next year. Perhaps then, SRK, Aamir and Salman will inch their way towards becoming the Power Khans."
Namrata Joshi describes the huge Arab interest in the Indian terror films  - Kabir Khan's "New York", Jai Tank's "Madholal Keep Walking" and Dr Biju's "Raman, Travelogue of Invasion" - which were screened at the film festival in Cairo. Although this also unleashed a storm of pirate copies, Director Kabir Khan is unperturbed. "Despite grossing US 1.5 million dollars at the box office, 'New York' is estimated to have lost close to a million dollars to piracy in the Middle East. But its success could open up newer markets for Indian films. 'We have managed to make inroads into territories where our films don't get released theatrically,' says Kabir. Yashraj has been approached by Arab distributors for theatrical and television rights of New York in Egypt and Morocco. Karan Johar's forthcoming film, 'My Name is Khan', which is being distributed worldwide by Fox, will also get released in Cairo next year. Perhaps then, SRK, Aamir and Salman will inch their way towards becoming the Power Khans."