The Local View ? Neighbourhood Cinemas and Alternative Film Projects

Many small neighbourhood cinemas invested in the future. The digital options for showing films are opening up new vistas for alternative projects. Not all of them are legal.... more more

GoetheInstitute

08/01/2007

Historicising the historians

Stefan Reinecke looks at the history of those who have told the history of the National Socialist era

It seems that Germany's climate of public debate surrounding the National Socialist era has become somewhat hysterical. Everyone wants to watch the drama of silence and guilt again, probably because the last actors are disappearing. This explains the weepy response to Günter Grass' admission that at the age of 17, he was a member of the Waffen SS for a few months (more). With the affair of the Habermas note and the membership in the Hitler Youth (more), the staging of guilt turned into a farce. When there's no guilt left, it has to be imagined as gossip. The Nazi elites lived for years unchallenged in prosperous postwar West Germany – and today, 60 years later, a teenager from the time isn't granted pardon.

Nonetheless, beyond the moral hyperventilating, the debate has a serious core, namely the question of what baggage the Flakhelfer generation schlepped with it from the National Socialist era. To what degree was the generation that shaped the old Federal Republic trapped in secessions and encapsulations?

Three years ago, the young historian Nicolas Berg (more) created a sort of passepartout for the debate, offering a comprehensive critique of the German historian's guild and Martin Broszat in particular. Broszat, who died in 1989, was a productive historian of the National Socialist era, a restless intellectual and, as Berg discovered, a member of the NSDAP at the age of 19. On the question of whether Broszat was aware of that or if he had simply been taken in in 1944, we have two historians and three opinions.

But the debate has to do with more than a possibly yellowed and hidden membership card. According to Volkhard Knigge, one of the historians invited by Norbert Frei to a symposium in Jena on Martin Broszat, it's in fact more of an "eerie suspicion" of the entire historian's guild. Its members have not only repressed their own participation in the National Socialist era, they have, consciously or not, contributed to its being excused. They have presented themselves as cool, objective solicitors and thus warded against anything that didn't fit into their own picture.

It's a tough accusation. It aims to destroy the self-image of historians like Hans Mommsen and Martin Broszat, who consider themselves to be explaining the facts but get caught hiding behind them. The fact that historians who present themselves as being responsible for the National Socialist era are thought have been deeply biased is more than an internal disciplinary issue. Nor is this debate an over-inflated meta-discourse through which researchers of the National Socialist era seek to compensate for their obvious loss in significance. At issue is the credibility of German research of the National Socialist era.

A key term here was "the un-articulated desire for exoneration." In Broszat's and Mommsen's attempts to explore the methodical structures and function of the National Socialist system, the perpetrators disappear in analytical abstractions. Indeed, motives and perpetrators were barely exposed in this functionalist view of history. In retrospect it becomes clear that the historians of the Flakhelfer generation assisted in clarifying the National Socialist era, but when it came to the exposure of ex-Nazis, the national consensus was that sleeping dogs were best left lying.

Seen from an academic perspective, it's ambiguous. The perspective adopted by Broszat & Co in the 1960s on the structures of the National Socialist system was enlightening at the time. It was therapeutic to correct the simplified notion of the demon Hitler who had seduced the people. At the same time, research on the perpetrators conducted in the 1980s by people like Ulrich Herbert built on this functionalism.

Dan Diner believes that the functionalists are asking the legitimate German question, namely: "How could it happen?" The Jewish questions, however - "Why did you do it? Why us?" - have been excluded from debate. This conclusion makes sense. But what follows from Diner's diagnosis is less plausible. Should German historians have been asking the Jewish question and not their own? Would they not have been accused of opening the wrong doors out of a need for exoneration? Was the identification with the victims not the cheap escape?

"Exoneration", when applied to the work of German historians, is a kind of dangerous magic word. It seems to explain a great deal and this makes it a trap. It functions as a universal key that somehow always fits.

But there is a blind spot with Broszat that's not to be retouched and which leaves his defenders at a loss: his extreme attitude towards Jewish historians. In a famous correspondence in 1987, ex-NSDAP member Broszat let the Holocaust survivor Saul Friedländer know that he was practicing rational, German historical research while Friedländer was more into mythic Jewish memory. This was a morally abysmal mix-up. Broszat was projecting his own bias on his Jewish counterpart.

Broszat's perspective, according to Norbert Frei in Jena, is "untenable". But that doesn't explain much. Broszat's coldness towards Jewish historians like Josef Wulf, who, despairing the stubborn German denial, killed himself in 1974, was not just a little mistake to be dismissed with a shrug of the shoulders. According to Sybille Steinbacher in Jena, it was without doubt a result of the "self-imposed empathy ban" that German historians had to observe in the 50s and 60s in order to be taken seriously as academics. And it was more: the dark side of the "pathos of sobriety" that Broszat claimed to possess and that was typical of his generation of Flakhelfers. By 1945, their belief in Hitler had gone up in smoke. The conclusion that many drew from that was never to believe again, only to know. This academic ethos was the centre of power of the German modern historians – and at the same time, a weapon with which to keep the annoying Jewish historians and their biographies at bay, if necessary.

Saul Friedländer took another wise look at the correspondence. His criticism of Broszat's divide was tough, his tone reconciliatory. One the whole, everyone tried to be objective. The showdown between Nicolas Berg, who could have played the role of the young rebel, and Hans Mommsen as resentful, insulted Donnergott, never happened. There was no damage done. Maybe the Oedipal revolts and the symbolic patricide have fuelled the culture of memory for too long.

Broszat pleaded for a historisation of the National Socialist era in 1985. Then, it was too early, but today it's precisely what's happening. The National Socialist era, which seemed to be drawing nearer in the 1990s, has become history, a part of the German self-image. The historisation of the National Socialist era is a fact. But the historisation of the research of National Socialism seems to have just begun.

*

This article originally appeared in the Tageszeitung on December 18, 2006.

Stefan Reinecke, born 1959, is editorial editor at the Tageszeitung.

translation:nb


Get the signandsight newsletter for regular updates on feature articles.
signandsight.com - let's talk european.

 
More articles

Poison envy

Tuesday 22 November, 2011

Read the first English excerpt from historian Goetz Aly's new book "Why the Germans? Why the Jews? Equality, Envy and Racial Hatred 1800 - 1933". In response to this question that has been hanging in the air since the end of WWII, Goetz Aly points to the lack of education and fear of progress in so many German Christians at the turn of the century - and to the contrasting readiness of the Jewish population to embrace the new opportunities and education as the ticket to social mobility. Shamed by their shortcomings, the Germans soon turned to racial theory to conceal their envy and resentment.
read more

Pas teutonique du tout!

Tuesday 11 July, 2011

TeaserPicAn exhibition in Naumburg celebrates the greatest sculptor and master builder of Medieval Germany, famed for the creation of Uta, the ideal German woman. But patriots be warned! By Sven Behrisch

read more

Rocking remembrance

Thursday 15 June, 2011

Berlin is rich in authentic places where history can be experienced in a tangible and personal manner. We don't need simulation, we should just listen more closely to the genius loci. The planned Memorial to Freedom and Unity is a case in point. By Karl Schlögel
read more

Mass murderers of conviction

Monday 18 April, 2011

TeaserPicThe trial of SS officer Adolf Eichmann began fifty years ago. Research continues to show that many of the perpetrators were not just bureaucrats and cretins but educated men who acted out of intellectual conviction - Eichmann, contrary to what Hannah Arendt said, included. An interview with Holocaust historian Ulrich Herbert by Stefan Reinecke and Christian Semler. (Photo: Adolf Eichmann during his trial in Jerusalem)
read more

A visit to the house of dreams

Monday 21 March, 2011

TeaserPicSir Sassoon Eskell was a Jewish Iraqi and the country's first minister of finance. His magnificent house, once home to the largest private library in Iraq, sits between Baghdad's Al Rashid Street and the River Tigris. After a close brush with death, author Najem Wali revisited the building, which young Iraqi filmmakers and the army both dream of making their own.
read more

A very different sort of banker

Monday 4 October, 2010

An exhibition in the Amsterdam Verzetsmuseum celebrates Wally van Hall, the banker who used his financial connections to fund the Dutch Resistance movement during WWII. By Dragan Klaic
read more

The Russians must reflect on the evildoings

Thursday 29 April, 2010

The historically strained relations between Russia and Poland seem to be improving at long last, thanks to the considerable show of Russian sympathy at the funeral of the Polish president Lech Kaczynski. It remains to be seen whether these positive developments will continue beyond a short-lived expression of mourning. An interview with Arseni Roginski, the president of the Russian human rights organisation "Memorial", by Ulrich M. Schmid.
read more

Musicology and mass execution

Wednesday 6 January, 2010

Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht was one of Germany's most influential musicologists. His magnum opus "Music in the Occident" sits on the shelves of many a music lover. Ten years after his death, historian Boris von Haken has now revealed that Eggebrecht was involved in mass shootings of Jews during the Second World War.
read more

The element of madness

Monday 7 December, 2009

The history of German terrorism was also the story of the amour fou between Gudrun Ensslin and Andreas Baader. But this affair caused the breakup of Ensslin's relationship with Bernward Vesper, who was also the father of her child. Their letters, dating from 1968/69, while Ensslin was in Stammheim, offer profound insights into the political pathology of the time. By Gerd Koenen.
read more

The starting gun for a student movement

Monday 8 June, 2009

The death of student Benno Ohnesorg saw the birth of the West German '68 movement. Now evidence has emerged that Karl-Heinz Kurras, the West German police officer who shot him during a demonstration against the Shah, was a Stasi spy. Wolfgang Kraushaar, an acclaimed chronicler of '68, asks whether the killing was an unofficial East German act of state.
read more

The black marketeers of Bahnhof Zoo

Tuesday 24 March 2009

TeaserPicThe idea that 1989 came out of thin air speaks volumes about historical insensitivities and limited horizons. The fall of the Berlin Wall was preceded by years of erosion and attrition. Historian Karl Schlögel looks at the molecular movements on the margins of history that are much more powerful than any deeds of "great men".
read more

Beyond the war hero

Tuesday 17 February, 2009

TeaserPicBernard-Henri Levy looks at some of the problems posed by the film "Valkyrie" which are too complex and delicate to be resolved within Hollywood logic. First on the list: the Scientology question.
read more

Unmasking the July 20 plot

Friday 13 February, 2009

To deny Stauffenberg and the other conspirators any moral and cultural relevance is blinkered and consitutes intellectual bigotry. Even if their ideas seem politically anachronistic today, these men showed the sort of noblesse and strength of character of which today’s politicians and other bureaucratic elites can only dream. Karl Heinz Bohrer responds to the thesis of British historian Richard J. Evans.
read more

Why did Stauffenberg plant the bomb?

Tuesday 10 February, 2009

TeaserPicWas it because Hitler was losing the war? Was it to put an end to the mass murder of the Jews. Or was it to save Germany's honour? Whatever his motives, he was no role model for future generations, says British historian Richard Evans. (Photo: Deutsches Historisches Museum)
read more

Evil and the upright citizen

Monday 4 February, 2008

A large-scale and long-overdue project has begun. German historians are documenting the persecution and extermination of the Jews in 16 volumes of primary source texts where metal merchants and budgie lovers all have their say - with no recourse to hindsight. By Eckhard Fuhr
read more