The Local View ? Neighbourhood Cinemas and Alternative Film Projects

Many small neighbourhood cinemas invested in the future. The digital options for showing films are opening up new vistas for alternative projects. Not all of them are legal.... more more

GoetheInstitute

24/08/2006

Israel has no choice

Tjark Kunstreich attacks Western public and media opinion for failing to counter Islamic anti-Semitisim and tacitly lending legitimacy to Hamas and Hizbullah

Is it possible in Germany today to discuss Israel and the war in Lebanon without reference to the Holocaust? This question was recently raised by Eva Menasse and Michael Kumpfmüller in our feature "This endless moral flutter". The following article addresses this problem, as do a number of others on our site: "The freedom of Bedlam" by Imre Kertesz (here) and "Israel's clenched fist" by Navid Kermani (here).

There is a consensus in the European media which makes the question posed by the magazine Stern seem perfectly natural: "What makes Israel so aggressive?" Israel, as the majority of the European media seems to have agreed, is the aggressor. Even if in Germany explicit comparisons with Israel and Nazi Germany are still taboo, except when made by Jews, the more implicit allusions pointing in the same direction are legion: the media shows Israeli Jews only as perpetrators and aggressors, the majority of images are of men and soldiers, whereas Lebanon seems to be made up of women and children - preferably dead ones. The Hisbollah makes as fleeting an appearance as the misery of the displaced people on the Israeli side. Imre Kertesz recently termed this naive Israel criticism as "Euro-anti-Semitism": recalling Nazi-victims one moment only to criticise Israel all the more vehemently the next (read our feature "The freedom of Bedlam," an interview with Kertesz).

In this context the taz can lay claim to the dubious title of Germany's most European paper. The premise for the sort of prototypical discourse that takes place on its pages is the double standard which does not concede to Israel things that every other state in the world would consider a matter of course. The unsettling thing about this is that media opinion, public opinion and politics are largely united in the will to dictate to Israel how it should react to the violation of its borders. Historically, such border violations have always been viewed as deliberate provocation, and have been understood as such in our world of nation states. Yet this has not applied, in the European view, to the "Jew among the states" (Hannah Arendt). On the contrary, when a country like France calls for negotiations on an exchange of prisoners, it lends legitimacy to the demands of Hamas and Hizbullah.

With wide-reaching consequences. Not only is the democratic state of Israel being equated with terrorist organisations that believe in total rule – which in the interest of political solutions can not always be avoided – far worse, it means that the fight against Israel as a Jewish state gains political recognition. However at variance the Islamic factions in the Middle East are, their aim to destroy Israel unites them. By honouring terrorist activity, such as the kidnapping and murder of soldiers on Israeli borders, as a conflict to be solved politically, the European Union under the aegis of France is contributing to the unification of those forces which categorically reject a settlement with Israel.

And this gives rise to the impression that it is in fact the Europeans that have no interest in peace or at least a long-term phase of stability in the Middle East. As diverse and sometimes divergent as the rhetoric of European governments and NGOs might be, when it comes to the crunch it is they, with their "critical dialogue" and culturally-obsessed interpretations, not to mention their playing down of an anti-Semitism bent on destruction, who have contributed to the continued boiling of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This means that when Jacques Chirac and other European politicians call for an "immediate ceasefire", they are trying to prevent any reduction to Hizbullah's and Hamas' elbow room.

This might sound absurd at first: Why would Europe have a vested interest in Islamic terror against Israel? The reason is fairly simple, although it refers to something no less irrational. The terror against Israel serves primarily as a distraction from the clerical-fascistic threat posed by political Islam in this region. As long as there is no Palestinian state, there will be no peace - this is the credo of European politics. But the geopolitical eruptions and collapses of recent decades have made it clear that a Palestinian state would be the last thing to guarantee Israel's security, and certainly would not bring about the end of the conflict. The Jihad, understood as a fascist "strategy of tension" which in its various manifestations in almost every Arab country has potential majority support, knows no political compromise. With the belief that under the green flag of Islamism there is a realistic chance of victory over Israel, comes a dream of conflagration which will sweep Israel and finally "the West" off the map.

Backing this sort of megalomaniac irrationalism still represents no real option for even the most shameless European politician right now. The repeated avowals that Israel and its inhabitants will be annihilated are being brushed off as a product of a choleric Arab mentality with a propensity for exaggeration. Instead there is widespread denial that a political project has formed, which like its Nazi forebear is based on crazed anti-Semitism. Politically, this European line could be rationalised to the effect that the current competition with the USA in the Middle East necessitates coming to an agreement with US enemies, to secure one's own economic interests. This might play a role, but it doesn't get to the crux of the issue, because it is still irrational to get involved with political powers in the knowledge that they will turn against Europe when the time comes. And another worrying thing about European apologies for Islamic rule is that they are fatally reminiscent of the rationale used first to justify the appeasement politics towards Nazi Germany and later, the collaboration with the German occupying forces.

And so there is a general concession that "the Arabs" have been humiliated - either at the hands of Israel, the USA or the former colonial powers – and this is why they have run riot. This is similar in tenor to the arguments used in relation to the first rumblings of National Socialism in Germany and the "Dictate of Versailles." Another argument is that Islamists are fighting poverty. There is as much unwillingness today to acknowledge the ideological cost of Hizbullah's social work, as there was in the past towards the social policies of the Nazis – quite apart from the fact that this sort of social politics now as then means alms for good behaviour. Another thing that smacks of the appeasement is the reaction towards the dismantling of human rights under the sign of anti-Semitism, racism and the persecution of political opponents. This is being underestimated and trivialised as a cultural issue. This goes not only for the countries in the Middle East, but also for the way immigration to Europe is being handled. Europe is no longer a safe haven for people fleeing Islamic rule. The appeasement of political Islam is already claiming its victims, think of Theo van Gogh and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. And this is precisely the climate in which the executors of Islamist justice feel at home. At demonstrations where German peace activists walk side by side with people calling "Death to the Jews", the friends of peace do not even register it, let alone distance themselves.

Apparently these apologist tendencies harbour a compulsive desire for repetition, one which surpasses the limits of decency and points to a European affinity for total rule now projected onto the Middle East. That these apologies end up benefiting the self-declared mortal enemies of the Jews speaks today as much as ever to Europeans' need for exoneration from their own history of extermination and collaboration. It's as if the fact that there are anti-Semites everywhere actually proved anti-Semitic allegations of the otherness of the Jews. This fact, however, shows that not only does Israel feel threatened, its existence actually is threatened. And this won't change as long as people fail to ask what makes Israel's opponents so inordinately aggressive. Pending that, Israel will have no alternative but to continue on its present course.

*

The originally appeared in German in Die Tageszeitung on August 9, 2006.

Tjark Kunstreich is a freelance journalist.

Translation: lp, jab.

Get the signandsight newsletter for regular updates on feature articles.
signandsight.com - let's talk european.

 
More articles

This kiss for the whole world

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Who actually owns "intellectual property"?  The German media that defend the concept of intellectual property as "real" property are the first to appropriate such rights, and they are using this idea as a defensive weapon. With lawmakers extending copyright laws and new structures emerging on the internet, intellectual property poses a serious challenge to the public domain. A survey of the German media landscape by Thierry Chervel
read more

Suddenly we know we are many

Wednesday 4th January, 2012

Why the Russian youth have tolerated the political situation in their country for so long and why they are no longer tolerant. The poet Natalia Klyuchareva explains the background to the protests on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on December 10th. Image: Leonid Faerberg
read more

The Republic of Europe

Tuesday 20 December, 2011

Thanks to Radoslaw Sikorski's speech in Berlin, Poland has at last joined the big European debate about restructuring the EU in connection with the euro crisis. The "European Reformation" advocated by Germany does not mean that the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation will be established in Europe, but instead – let us hope – the Republic of Europe. By Adam Krzeminski
read more

Brown is not red

Tuesday 13 December, 2011

TeaserPicFilmmaker and theatre director Andres Veiel disagrees with the parallels currently being drawn between left-wing and right-wing violence in Germany. The RAF is the wrong model for the Zwickau neo-Nazi group, the so-called "Brown Army Faction" responsible for a series of murders of Turkish small business owners. Unlike the RAF, this group never publicly claimed responsibility for their crimes. Veiel is emphatic - you have to look at the biographies of the perpetrators. An interview with Heike Karen Runge.
read more

Legacy of denial

Tuesday 29 November, 2011

TeaserPicGermany has been rocked by the disclosures surrounding the series of neo-Nazi murders of Turkish citizens. In the wake of these events, Former GDR dissident Freya Klier calls for an honest look at the xenophobia cultivated by the policies of the former East Germany, where the core of the so-called "Brown Army Faction" was based. And demands that East Germans finally confront a long-denied past. (Photo: © Nadja Klier)
read more

Nausea in Paris

Monday 14 November, 2011

TeaserPicIn response to the arson attack on the offices of the Parisian satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on November 2, Danish critic and semiotician Frederik Stjernfelt is nauseated by the opinions voiced against the publication, especially in the British and American media. Why don't they see that Islamism is right-wing extremism?
read more

Just one pyramid

Monday 10 October, 2011

Activist and author, Andri Snaer Magnason is among the Icelandic guests of honor at this year's Frankfurt Book Fair. His book and film "Dreamland" is both an ecological call to action and a polemic. "The politicians took one of the most beautiful parts of Iceland and offered it to unscrupulous companies," says the author in a critique of his native country. By Daniela Zinser
read more

Dark side of the light

Monday 3 October 2011

In their book "Lügendes Licht" (lying light) Thomas Worm and Claudia Karstedt explore the darker side of the EU ban on incandescent bulbs. From disposal issues to energy efficiency, the low-energy bulb is not necessarily a beacon of a greener future. By Brigitte Werneburg
read more

Lubricious puritanism

Tuesday 30 August, 2011

The malice of the American media in the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a symptom of sexual uptightness that borders on the sinister, and the feminists have joined forces with the religious Right to see it through. We can learn much from America, but not when it comes to the art of love. By Pascal Bruckner
read more

Much ado about Sarrazin

Monday 22 August 2011

Published a year ago, the controversial book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" (Germany is doing away with itself) by former banker and Berlin Finance Senator Thilo Sarrazin sparked intense discussion. Hamed Abdel-Samad asks: what has the Sarrazin debate achieved beyond polarisation and insult? And how can Germany avoid cultivating its own classes of "future foreigners"?
read more

Economic giant, political dwarf

Wednesday 3 August, 2011

Germany's growing imbalance between economic and political competence is worsening the European crisis and indeed the crisis of Nato. The country has ceased to make any political signals at all and demonstrates a conspicuous lack of responsibility for what takes place beyond its own borders. This smug isolationism is linked to strains of old anti-Western and anti-political, anti-parliamentarian sentiment that is pure provincialism. By Karl Heinz Bohrer
read more

Sound and fury

Monday 11 April 2011

Budapest is shimmering with culture but Hungary's nationalist government is throwing its weight about in cultural life, effecting censorship through budget cuts and putting its own people in the top-level cultural positions. Government tolerance of hate campaigns against Jews and gays has provoked the likes of Andras Schiff, Agnes Heller, Bela Tarr and Andre Fischer to raise their voices in defence of basic human rights. But a lot of people are simply scared. By Volker Hagedorn
read more

The self-determination delusion

Monday 28 March, 2011

TeaserPicA Dutch action group for free will wants to give all people the right to assisted suicide. But can this be achieved without us ending up somewhere we never wanted to go? Gerbert van Loenen has grave doubts.
read more

Revolution without guarantee

Monday 21 February, 2011

Saying revolution and freedom is not the same as saying democracy, respect for minorities, equal rights and good relations with neighbouring nations. All this has yet to be achieved. We welcome the Arab revolution and will continue to watch with our eyes open to the potential dangers. By Andre Glucksmann
read more

Pascal Bruckner and the reality disconnect

Friday 14 January, 2011

The French writer Pascal Bruckner wants to forbid a word. Which sounds more like a typically German obsession. But for Bruckner, "Islamophobia" is one of "those expressions which we dearly need to banish from our vocabulary". One asks oneself with some trepidation which other words we "dearly need" to get rid of: Right-wing populism? Racism? Relativism? By Alan Posener
read more