22/03/2006

Canfora's scandalous history of democracy

Adam Krzeminski explains why Luciano Canfora's history of democracy in Europe is a scandal not worthy of publication

"Democracy of Europe" is Luciano Canfora's contribution to the "Making of Europe" series initiated and edited by the French historian Jacques Le Goff. But the book is creating a scandal and the German publisher of the series has refused to print it.

Germany and Poland on the same side of a historical debate? That's the way it looks for Luciano Canfora, the 63-year-old author of "Democracy in Europe", which has already been published in Italy, France and Spain and will soon appear on the British market. The Munich based publishing house, C.H. Beck, however, has refused. Amongst other reaons, it cited Canfora's comments on Poland, his analysis of the Hitler Stalin pact and his interpretation of Stalin's politics as a possible third way alongside western parliamentary democracy and fascism.

Canfora is a reknowned historian in Italy and author of a valued biography of Caesar; his Italian publishing house and the press rallied to his defence. The Germans were criticised for censorship, not because of Poland but because Canfora compares the Adenauer years in Germany to General Franco's Spain.

Detlef Felken, chief editor of C.H. Beck publishing house says these allegations are nonsense. After all, C.H. Beck published Norbert Frei's work, "Vergangenheitspolitik" (politics dealing with the past) about the failure to come to terms with Nazism during the Adenauer period, a book which was also well-known in Poland. And the decision had nothing to do with censorship, in his opinion. Anyone who wants to publish Canfora's book, he says, may do so. It's just C.H. Beck didn't want anything to do with it because, he claims, the Italian has written a pamphlet against democracy. "He criticises western democracies wholesale as a system of exploitation and tries to rehabilitate the "people's democracies," seeing their degeneration as a tragic failure or the result of external intervention."

Canfora is an Italian Euro-communist. He dedicates much space in his book to the Paris Commune of 1871 and to the French torture of Algerians during the Algerian war, but fails to even mention the Gulags or Stalin's purges. For him, Stalin was a great statesman and he believes the communist "people's democracies" developed a higher level of democracy than parliamentary democracies. This is what he writes of the pact between Hitler and Stalin:

"We know that the Russians felt they had been cheated by the deliberately inconclusive way in which the English and French conducted the negotiations. They repeated the decision of Brest-Litovsk, so-to-speak in a totally different political situation, extracting themselves from the coming war as then they had come out of the anti-imperialist war. Over the years, a myth has sprung up over the 'partition' of Poland by Hitler and Stalin, yet another episode in the long history of partition. The truth is that in 1938/39 Poland was a hysterically anti-Soviet and compliant towards Hitler's Germany, on whose behavior Poland's foreign minister Beck, modelled his own (including withdrawal from the League of Nations on August 11, 1938). After the Munich Agreement of September 1938 Poland played a part in the partition of Czechoslovakia annexed by the Reich, receiving, as its share of the spoils, the mining area of Teschen. Polish policy in the months leading up to the Nazi-Soviet pact is described in the following terms by Hugh Seton-Watson, the greatest Western historian of eastern Europe, in his fine study 'Eastern Europe Between the Wars, 1918-1941'(1945). 'Confident of their hold on army and police, "cleverly" playing off against each other the different sections of the Opposition, the bosses of the regime prayed that the crisis would last as long as possible, and meanwhile made small preparations either on the home front or on the frontiers.' For its part the USSR, through the pact, regained the territories it had lost in the peace imposed upon it by Germany in 1918 (a loss which the Versailles treaty had not remedied)." (quote taken directly from "Democracy in Europe", Blackwell Publishing)

The absurdities and misrepresentations are really overwhelming. Canfora doesn't only ignore the secret ammendment to the pact between Hitler and Stalin, which defined the border of a further partition of Poland, he also keeps quiet about the 1921 peace treaty signed in Riga and Stalin's breach of the 1934 Non-Aggression Pact. He skims over the fact that Hitler was determined to wage war against the USSR but Poland repeatedly rejected the proposition. However, Stalin and Hitler's preparations for war against Poland are depicted by the Italian professor as a "pre-emptive peace," which created "a convenient framework for the expanison of Soviet influence."

The reader can't believe his eyes. 15 years after the collapse of communism and here is Canfora fully embracing the basic principle of Stalinism; everything that served the USSR was historically right. That's not very far removed from Putin's comment that the break-up of the USSR not only spelled disaster for the fate of Russia, but also for Europe.

Felken is completely right when he says that the afore-mentioned passages from Canfora's book are "scandalous". He's also right to argue that calling the anti-Russian (and anti-German) Poles hysterical is tantamount to "ignoring the past experiences of the Poles as well as those still to come. This hysteria was more than justified..."

Canfora's incredibly arbitrary excerpts from the history of democracy concentrate on ancient Greece, Italy, France, Great Britain, Germany and naturally Russia – from the "obscina" (traditional village community) to the USSR. Not a word about the Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth which lasted centuries, with its tradition of freedom and tolerance and the nobles' democracy. Not a word about the Sejm (Polish parliament) and the Polish Constitution of May 3, which was in fact the first consitution in Europe. The Italian historian doesn't recognise the fundamental dilemma at the heart of the Tsarist system after 1815 – a liberal constitutional monarchy in the kingdom of Poland and an autocracy in Russia. He pinpoints Mazzini and Garibaldi as the fathers of democracy in the 19th century and disregards the Polish and Hungarian freedom movements.

Another horrendous footnote must be added to the list of omissions and distortions which the publishing house C.H. Beck initiated. In his book, Canfora dedicated several pages of warm words to the polish Tito, Wladyslaw Gomulka, but doesn't spare a thought for Solidarnosc (the Solidarity movement), the strikes in 1980 or the roundtable talks in 1989. He lauds Stalin but doesn't even mention Lech Walesa's name.

Even if the book is written with great effect, is has neither an intellectual nor a moral justification. It's a scandal that it was incorporated in the valuable international series "Making of Europe" which is edited by the well-reknowned French Medievalist Jacques Le Goff.

In 1993, when Le Goff began the "Making of Europe" series, he wrote the noble words, "Europe is being built. Borne on great hope. But the hopes will only be fulfilled when they do justice to what has gone before. A Europe devoid of history would have no past and no future." To date there have been 20 publications. Among the authors are reknowned historians, such as Hagen Schulze, Joseph Fontana, Charles Tilly, Aaron Gurjewicz, Umberto Eco, Massimo Montanari, Werner Rösener, Peter Brown... Their books are written stuninngly, using daring hypotheses and razor-sharp argumentation.

Yet you'll only find references to central eastern Europe in the footnotes. Listed in the index of names are a scattering of Poles and Hungarians. In Hagen Schulze's "State and nation in the history of Europe" there's solely Kosciuszko who pops up at the Vienna Congress to demand the restitution of Poland. In "European Revolutions", Charles Tilly mentions Stenka Razin but not Walesa. It's incredible how the revolutions in 1989 in central Europe are classified – there was a revolution in the GDR but not really in Poland. There is also a little information about Poland in Tilly's chapter on Russia. The author writes that the Res publica had been aggressive in the 16th century, but had guaranteed Russia a comparatively stabile border to the north-west.

These books are, on the whole, a legacy of the eighties when historiography was dominated by a view of history that looked at events through the prism of the great powers. But even then, Norman Davies was working on his book, "Europe. A History" in which he took pains not just to include the centres of power but also the countries and cultures on the peripheries who often played the role of catalyst to European processes.

Then as now, historians are incredibly obstinate creatures. The publishing house C.H. Beck deserves all the more recognition, as their refusal to publish Canfora's book has drawn the attention of the western European public to the drastic deficit in knowledge about the history of our part of Europe and the downplaying of Stalinism.

*

The article originally appeared in Polish in the Gazeta Wyborcza on December 31, 2005, and it was published in German by Perlentaucher on March 15, 2006.

Adam Krzeminski was born in West Galicia in 1945 and has been editor of the magazine Polityka since 1973. He is one of Poland's leading journalists and chairman of the Polish-German Association in Warsaw.

Translation: Abby Darcy.

Get the signandsight newsletter for regular updates on feature articles.
signandsight.com - let's talk european.

 
More articles

This kiss for the whole world

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Who actually owns "intellectual property"?  The German media that defend the concept of intellectual property as "real" property are the first to appropriate such rights, and they are using this idea as a defensive weapon. With lawmakers extending copyright laws and new structures emerging on the internet, intellectual property poses a serious challenge to the public domain. A survey of the German media landscape by Thierry Chervel
read more

Suddenly we know we are many

Wednesday 4th January, 2012

Why the Russian youth have tolerated the political situation in their country for so long and why they are no longer tolerant. The poet Natalia Klyuchareva explains the background to the protests on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on December 10th. Image: Leonid Faerberg
read more

The Republic of Europe

Tuesday 20 December, 2011

Thanks to Radoslaw Sikorski's speech in Berlin, Poland has at last joined the big European debate about restructuring the EU in connection with the euro crisis. The "European Reformation" advocated by Germany does not mean that the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation will be established in Europe, but instead – let us hope – the Republic of Europe. By Adam Krzeminski
read more

Brown is not red

Tuesday 13 December, 2011

TeaserPicFilmmaker and theatre director Andres Veiel disagrees with the parallels currently being drawn between left-wing and right-wing violence in Germany. The RAF is the wrong model for the Zwickau neo-Nazi group, the so-called "Brown Army Faction" responsible for a series of murders of Turkish small business owners. Unlike the RAF, this group never publicly claimed responsibility for their crimes. Veiel is emphatic - you have to look at the biographies of the perpetrators. An interview with Heike Karen Runge.
read more

Legacy of denial

Tuesday 29 November, 2011

TeaserPicGermany has been rocked by the disclosures surrounding the series of neo-Nazi murders of Turkish citizens. In the wake of these events, Former GDR dissident Freya Klier calls for an honest look at the xenophobia cultivated by the policies of the former East Germany, where the core of the so-called "Brown Army Faction" was based. And demands that East Germans finally confront a long-denied past. (Photo: © Nadja Klier)
read more

Nausea in Paris

Monday 14 November, 2011

TeaserPicIn response to the arson attack on the offices of the Parisian satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on November 2, Danish critic and semiotician Frederik Stjernfelt is nauseated by the opinions voiced against the publication, especially in the British and American media. Why don't they see that Islamism is right-wing extremism?
read more

Just one pyramid

Monday 10 October, 2011

Activist and author, Andri Snaer Magnason is among the Icelandic guests of honor at this year's Frankfurt Book Fair. His book and film "Dreamland" is both an ecological call to action and a polemic. "The politicians took one of the most beautiful parts of Iceland and offered it to unscrupulous companies," says the author in a critique of his native country. By Daniela Zinser
read more

Dark side of the light

Monday 3 October 2011

In their book "Lügendes Licht" (lying light) Thomas Worm and Claudia Karstedt explore the darker side of the EU ban on incandescent bulbs. From disposal issues to energy efficiency, the low-energy bulb is not necessarily a beacon of a greener future. By Brigitte Werneburg
read more

Lubricious puritanism

Tuesday 30 August, 2011

The malice of the American media in the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a symptom of sexual uptightness that borders on the sinister, and the feminists have joined forces with the religious Right to see it through. We can learn much from America, but not when it comes to the art of love. By Pascal Bruckner
read more

Much ado about Sarrazin

Monday 22 August 2011

Published a year ago, the controversial book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" (Germany is doing away with itself) by former banker and Berlin Finance Senator Thilo Sarrazin sparked intense discussion. Hamed Abdel-Samad asks: what has the Sarrazin debate achieved beyond polarisation and insult? And how can Germany avoid cultivating its own classes of "future foreigners"?
read more

Economic giant, political dwarf

Wednesday 3 August, 2011

Germany's growing imbalance between economic and political competence is worsening the European crisis and indeed the crisis of Nato. The country has ceased to make any political signals at all and demonstrates a conspicuous lack of responsibility for what takes place beyond its own borders. This smug isolationism is linked to strains of old anti-Western and anti-political, anti-parliamentarian sentiment that is pure provincialism. By Karl Heinz Bohrer
read more

Sound and fury

Monday 11 April 2011

Budapest is shimmering with culture but Hungary's nationalist government is throwing its weight about in cultural life, effecting censorship through budget cuts and putting its own people in the top-level cultural positions. Government tolerance of hate campaigns against Jews and gays has provoked the likes of Andras Schiff, Agnes Heller, Bela Tarr and Andre Fischer to raise their voices in defence of basic human rights. But a lot of people are simply scared. By Volker Hagedorn
read more

The self-determination delusion

Monday 28 March, 2011

TeaserPicA Dutch action group for free will wants to give all people the right to assisted suicide. But can this be achieved without us ending up somewhere we never wanted to go? Gerbert van Loenen has grave doubts.
read more

Revolution without guarantee

Monday 21 February, 2011

Saying revolution and freedom is not the same as saying democracy, respect for minorities, equal rights and good relations with neighbouring nations. All this has yet to be achieved. We welcome the Arab revolution and will continue to watch with our eyes open to the potential dangers. By Andre Glucksmann
read more

Pascal Bruckner and the reality disconnect

Friday 14 January, 2011

The French writer Pascal Bruckner wants to forbid a word. Which sounds more like a typically German obsession. But for Bruckner, "Islamophobia" is one of "those expressions which we dearly need to banish from our vocabulary". One asks oneself with some trepidation which other words we "dearly need" to get rid of: Right-wing populism? Racism? Relativism? By Alan Posener
read more