On the Death of Siegfried Lenz ? ?You have to justify your life?

Siegfried Lenz, one of the great writers of German post-war literature is dead. He died on 7 October 2014, surrounded by his family. He was 88 years old.... more more

GoetheInstitute

15/06/2005

Friendly takeover

Dominique de Villepin and the Secrets of Europe. By Gustav Seibt

The depth of the mess that France has been plunged into by the plebiscite 'no' can be calculated in the suggestion made by Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin in his government declaration concerning the German French relationship. His idea of a "union with Germany in particular selected areas" is flamboyant terminological feuilletonismus and doctrinaire, highly interesting hot air.

France, still highly centralised, wants to be united with those domains within the German state which don't fall under the authority of the German federal states or Europe. This would comprise the core of the existent federal state, particularly in foreign and defence policy but also in research and social policy – quantitatively expressed, roughly 60 to 70 percent of the German federal budget.

Given the totally different federal composition of the French state, this union would be grotesquely weighted in favour of Paris, and reminiscent of the Napoleonic Rheinbund and the situation Germany found itself in after 1806. At the time, those German states associated with France retained minimal internal competence while military power as well as the foreign and trade policy were subject to strict treaties.

Certainly times have changed and what was then a hostile takeover would be understood today as a friendly one. In the unlikely event that this castle in the air were actually to be erected and built into a functioning system, what would the consequences be? The block between the Atlantic and the Oder would only lead to polarised opposition from the remaining EU treaty partners, which would predictably turn to Euro-sceptical England or orient themselves increasingly towards America. One could expect a new demarcation between "old" and "new" Europe.

The division created by the most recent war in Iraq reiterated other inner-European structural boundaries, which had manifested themselves after the cold war during the discussions on Yugoslavia. Suddenly the constellation of the period between the two World Wars played a fatal role again, complete with the instability of the inner-European coalitions and interest groups. It is as certain as the law of gravity that Villepin's idea would have a similar effect, were it to be realised. And the Federal Republic of Germany would lose the equidistance from Paris and Washington on which its foreign position has traditionally been based. Such a step would rob Germany of its importance in the international realm. Its foreign policy would be decided in Paris.

The realisation of such a project is inconceivable: this is the charm of Villepin's doctrinaire, brilliantly feuilletonistic suggestion. It could lead to a further historical understanding of the finality of Europe, of the "European project". At the present, this is primarily being conceived by intellectuals and lawyers in terms that stem from the development of the modern nation-state. In the future, the feeling of community and citizenship and the European public should be carried by a constitutional framework which should compensate, in a democratic way, for the deficient legitimacy of the European superstructure.

This future citizen's and constitutional European state would be post-traditional, extra-ethnic and multi-linguistic, held together by the economy and trade and social and legal guarantees on the one hand, but also by shared values and ideals on the other. Europe would become a democratic civil state with a super-national culture but nonetheless oriented to the unity of people and state, which Hegel described as 'particularly general'. Europe would be a further "universal nation", based on a predominantly French model, with a few American modifications.

In contrast to these concepts, we must urgently recall the second, in parts antagonistic historical basis of the European idea; the concept of a European balance, the "Societé Civile" of European powers, which was set up following the Enlightenment advance of the 18th century by the restorative diplomats of the Vienna Congress with the help of France but also in opposition to the universal, expansionist nation of Napoleon. At the time it was considered a given that only with the equal participation by all nations in the European balance of powers, peace would be guaranteed to all of Europe. This system held until 1914, despite the radical transformation caused by the founding of the Italian and German states.

In 1919 in Versailles, it was no longer possible to stabilise such a multi-limbed European arrangement of states, in part because the drafters of the Versailles treaty could not bring themselves to offer defeated Germany the mild conditions of peace that France had been amicably offered in 1814/15, largely due to the superior insight of Metternich und Castlereagh. It was primarily the French politicians who prevented this in Versailles, after the unprecedented terror of trench warfare which had taken place in France.

But the problem of an inner-European balance continued to exist, exacerbated by the downfall of the multi-ethnic states of Russia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire and by the Right to Self Determination of the People that was made doctrine by American President Woodrow Wilson.

After the victory over Hitler's Germany, the Cold War initially obscured this ongoing European peace problematic. The question of hegemony and balance of power in the European context was overshadowed by the global polarisation of the atomic powers. Almost immediately after German reunification of 1989/90, European policy encountered it again. The defense strategies of Thatcher and Mitterand conformed to the classic power dynamic of Europe; German reunification was made possible largely due to the cooperation of the opposing Cold War powers, the United States and the Soviet Union. France was calmed down with its admission to the monetary union. Then came Yugoslavia, followed by the Iraq war and these events proved how much of the tension of the old constellation of Europe was still alive.

It is thus more than just a turn of phrase to describe the EU as a thing between a federation of states and a federal republic. Both terms represent a concentration of historical experience whose importance cannot be overestimated. The nation, including its federal state, stands for the realisation of freedom while the federation of states represents the guarantee of peace. In reality, the experience of power expressed in the term of the federation of states plays a much greater role, while in the stratosphere of ideas, it is the notion of the federal republic with its connotations of the nation and freedom, that dominates. France, with its centralist tradition and traditionally broken relationship to the European balance has greater problems with the terminological balance than England, Benelux, Italy or Germany – the last traditionally split nations.

Dominique de Villepin is considered an elegant aesthete, loves lyrics and great rhetorical performances. Perhaps before making his suggestion, he should have consulted a masterpiece of French prose which, after a certain amount of turbulence, gained a clarified European perspective: the Memoirs of Talleyrand, Foreign Minister under Napoleon, then under Louis XVIII at the Vienna Congress, finally as representative of Louis Philippe, in charge of the European founding of Belgium in 1830. Nowhere are the secrets of the European society of states better thought through than in this work.

*

The article originally appeared in German in the Süddeutsche Zeitung on June 10, 2005.

Gustav Seibt, born in 1959, studied literature and history. He was editor at the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, has written for Die Zeit and currently writes for the Süddeutsche Zeitung. His most recent book "Rom oder Tod" deals with the founding of Italy in 1861.


translation: nb

Get the signandsight newsletter for regular updates on feature articles.
signandsight.com - let's talk european.

 
More articles

This kiss for the whole world

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Who actually owns "intellectual property"?  The German media that defend the concept of intellectual property as "real" property are the first to appropriate such rights, and they are using this idea as a defensive weapon. With lawmakers extending copyright laws and new structures emerging on the internet, intellectual property poses a serious challenge to the public domain. A survey of the German media landscape by Thierry Chervel
read more

Suddenly we know we are many

Wednesday 4th January, 2012

Why the Russian youth have tolerated the political situation in their country for so long and why they are no longer tolerant. The poet Natalia Klyuchareva explains the background to the protests on Bolotnaya Square in Moscow on December 10th. Image: Leonid Faerberg
read more

The Republic of Europe

Tuesday 20 December, 2011

Thanks to Radoslaw Sikorski's speech in Berlin, Poland has at last joined the big European debate about restructuring the EU in connection with the euro crisis. The "European Reformation" advocated by Germany does not mean that the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation will be established in Europe, but instead – let us hope – the Republic of Europe. By Adam Krzeminski
read more

Brown is not red

Tuesday 13 December, 2011

TeaserPicFilmmaker and theatre director Andres Veiel disagrees with the parallels currently being drawn between left-wing and right-wing violence in Germany. The RAF is the wrong model for the Zwickau neo-Nazi group, the so-called "Brown Army Faction" responsible for a series of murders of Turkish small business owners. Unlike the RAF, this group never publicly claimed responsibility for their crimes. Veiel is emphatic - you have to look at the biographies of the perpetrators. An interview with Heike Karen Runge.
read more

Legacy of denial

Tuesday 29 November, 2011

TeaserPicGermany has been rocked by the disclosures surrounding the series of neo-Nazi murders of Turkish citizens. In the wake of these events, Former GDR dissident Freya Klier calls for an honest look at the xenophobia cultivated by the policies of the former East Germany, where the core of the so-called "Brown Army Faction" was based. And demands that East Germans finally confront a long-denied past. (Photo: © Nadja Klier)
read more

Nausea in Paris

Monday 14 November, 2011

TeaserPicIn response to the arson attack on the offices of the Parisian satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo on November 2, Danish critic and semiotician Frederik Stjernfelt is nauseated by the opinions voiced against the publication, especially in the British and American media. Why don't they see that Islamism is right-wing extremism?
read more

Just one pyramid

Monday 10 October, 2011

Activist and author, Andri Snaer Magnason is among the Icelandic guests of honor at this year's Frankfurt Book Fair. His book and film "Dreamland" is both an ecological call to action and a polemic. "The politicians took one of the most beautiful parts of Iceland and offered it to unscrupulous companies," says the author in a critique of his native country. By Daniela Zinser
read more

Dark side of the light

Monday 3 October 2011

In their book "Lügendes Licht" (lying light) Thomas Worm and Claudia Karstedt explore the darker side of the EU ban on incandescent bulbs. From disposal issues to energy efficiency, the low-energy bulb is not necessarily a beacon of a greener future. By Brigitte Werneburg
read more

Lubricious puritanism

Tuesday 30 August, 2011

The malice of the American media in the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn is a symptom of sexual uptightness that borders on the sinister, and the feminists have joined forces with the religious Right to see it through. We can learn much from America, but not when it comes to the art of love. By Pascal Bruckner
read more

Much ado about Sarrazin

Monday 22 August 2011

Published a year ago, the controversial book "Deutschland schafft sich ab" (Germany is doing away with itself) by former banker and Berlin Finance Senator Thilo Sarrazin sparked intense discussion. Hamed Abdel-Samad asks: what has the Sarrazin debate achieved beyond polarisation and insult? And how can Germany avoid cultivating its own classes of "future foreigners"?
read more

Economic giant, political dwarf

Wednesday 3 August, 2011

Germany's growing imbalance between economic and political competence is worsening the European crisis and indeed the crisis of Nato. The country has ceased to make any political signals at all and demonstrates a conspicuous lack of responsibility for what takes place beyond its own borders. This smug isolationism is linked to strains of old anti-Western and anti-political, anti-parliamentarian sentiment that is pure provincialism. By Karl Heinz Bohrer
read more

Sound and fury

Monday 11 April 2011

Budapest is shimmering with culture but Hungary's nationalist government is throwing its weight about in cultural life, effecting censorship through budget cuts and putting its own people in the top-level cultural positions. Government tolerance of hate campaigns against Jews and gays has provoked the likes of Andras Schiff, Agnes Heller, Bela Tarr and Andre Fischer to raise their voices in defence of basic human rights. But a lot of people are simply scared. By Volker Hagedorn
read more

The self-determination delusion

Monday 28 March, 2011

TeaserPicA Dutch action group for free will wants to give all people the right to assisted suicide. But can this be achieved without us ending up somewhere we never wanted to go? Gerbert van Loenen has grave doubts.
read more

Revolution without guarantee

Monday 21 February, 2011

Saying revolution and freedom is not the same as saying democracy, respect for minorities, equal rights and good relations with neighbouring nations. All this has yet to be achieved. We welcome the Arab revolution and will continue to watch with our eyes open to the potential dangers. By Andre Glucksmann
read more

Pascal Bruckner and the reality disconnect

Friday 14 January, 2011

The French writer Pascal Bruckner wants to forbid a word. Which sounds more like a typically German obsession. But for Bruckner, "Islamophobia" is one of "those expressions which we dearly need to banish from our vocabulary". One asks oneself with some trepidation which other words we "dearly need" to get rid of: Right-wing populism? Racism? Relativism? By Alan Posener
read more