In the latest production of Rimini Protokoll there are again experts. But the main actor is the audience, which guide 200 avatars through a game of life....
more
Günther Oettinger takes it back: the claim he made in his speech at the funeral of Hans Filbinger (obit) that the man had opposed the Nazi regime. It took a long time. Now it's out. Günther Oettinger actually humbled himself. Angela Merkel is satisfied. On Monday, Baden-Württemberg premier Günther Oettinger offered an apology and now it seems to be up to us, the public, to accept it. But we didn't hear an apology. Mr. Oettinger said that he felt badly about the misunderstanding. But there was no misunderstanding. And quite apart from that: it would have been wonderful had the politicians realised that one can't excuse oneself. An apology can not be accepted by the person who speaks it but rather and only by the person to whom it is owed. So Oettinger cannot excuse himself. But he can and should ask to be excused. That he has yet to do. For days, he didn't acknowledge that he had done anything wrong. He said he was sorry if there had been a misunderstanding – the head of the CDU in Baden Württemberg was willing to go no further than that. Now he's decided to relent and retract the most repellent of his comments.
That's good. That is a first step but it's not enough. Angela Merkel persevered. She showed Günther Oettinger and his kind that the whitewashing of history has its limits. We're pleased about that. We still remember how long we waited in vain for this kind of decisiveness from Helmut Kohl.
Let us recall what Günther Oettinger said in his funeral speech: "Despite what is to be read in some obituaries, we must affirm: Hans Filbinger was no Nazi. To the contrary: he was an opponent of the National Socialist regime." Later in the same speech, Oettinger explained: "For the record: no judgement of Hans Filbinger led to the loss of a human life." These were the sentences that caused the scandal. They were lies. Worse, however, was the pithy tone with which Oettinger delivered his superior knowledge. In Oettinger's first reaction, which took days to come, he didn't take back any of his remarks. He repeated that Filbinger had been an opponent of the National Socialists. But he started the sentence with "I believe." Thus his comments left the realm of asserted facts and entered that of Credo. In the eyes of sceptical observers, this amounted to a retraction; in the eyes of his supporters, a confirmation.
He allowed Bild to ask a few questions and that's where the decisive comment appeared: "When I got to know him (Filbinger) later, he was a deeply Christian and conservative person who had distanced himself demonstrably from the NS regime." Anyone who heard the choppy staccato of his funeral speech knew that this was a retreat of sorts. But it was equally evident that Oettinger was not able to bring himself to say that it was wrong – dishonest – to claim that Filbinger had been an opponent of the Nazi regime. Oettinger had no evidence for this claim. He simply made it, hoping he'd get away with it.
That he didn't get away with it speaks for an alert public and even more, for the Chancellor and CDU head Angela Merkel. Her reaction – and of course its publication by the CDU – taught Oettinger a few mores. It would be nice if there was no place whatsoever in the CDU for such lies. And definitely not at the level of premier.
But the fact that Oettinger is getting off so easily – not naming his error as such, not having to ask for an apology but rather just modifying his comments – confirms the widely-shared sense that the governing classes have gotten quite comfortable in a self-righteousness that's immune to all people and all things. It's impossible to demand of children, students and the rest of humanity that they admit their mistakes when a political leader has yet to understand that making and admitting mistakes are pre-requisites to avoiding them. Of course, it's easy to think that this is less about the whitewashing of random mistakes and more an honouring and perpetuation of the specifically Christian conservative Nazi whitewashing of the West German post-war era. But that can't be in our interest – nor in that of the CDU and Angela Merkel.
*
This article originally appeared in the Frankfurter Rundschau on April 17, 2007.
Arno Widmann was born in 1948 and studied philosophy in Frankfurt with Theodor W. Adorno. A founder and editor-in-chief of die tageszeitung, he has also worked as senior editor of the German Vogue and arts editor of Die Zeit. Today he is feuilleton editor of the Frankfurter Rundschau. He has translated Umberto Eco, Curzio Malaparte and Victor Serge into German. His literary debut came with his 2002 novel "Sprenger".
translation: nb
RSS
Thirty years of superficial reporting by the Western press neglected the build up to the current turmoil in Tehran. Iranians are not risking their lives because of an alleged election fraud last June, but because they have endured thirty years of brutality, humiliation and frustration. By Haideh Daragahi
To advocate the Swiss minaret ban with the arguments of Anne Applebaum, Henryk Broder and Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is to apply to the sort of fundamentalist logic which the west left behind - historically speaking - an amazingly short time ago. If we don't want to return to a pre-1648 world, Gustav Seibt argues, what we need now is two-way tolerance.
Claus Leggewie and Harald Welzer have written a book about the end of the world as we knew it. Jan Feddersen grills them on climate change and the role of democracy in a political system that has had no new ideas since the fall of the Wall.
UPDATE: Herta Müller wins the Nobel Prize for Literature 2009. Twenty years after Ceausescu's execution, his secret service is still active - only its name has changed. Secret files are being manipulated; shadowing and smear campaigns continue. For the first time, Romanian-born German writer Herta Müller describes her long history of Securitate persecution, uncertain of how much she has yet to endure.
In local elections at the beginning of the month, the Austrian state of Carinthia effectively granted a governing majority to a dead man. Eva Menasse looks at an idyllically beautiful corner of the world that has been dumbed-down to death. Photo by 
The fatwa against British Indian author Salman Rushdie was issued 20 years ago. Today, says Thierry Chervel, Islamism has the West more firmly in its grip than ever before – thanks to our left-wing intellectuals.
Tunisian-born writer Abdelwahab Meddeb depicts the pain and sadness afflicting Gaza, where the horror of the human race appears in all its nakedness.
The age of privatisation is over. Politics not the market is responsible for promoting the common good. Philosopher Jürgen Habermas talks to Thomas Assheuer about the necessity of an international world order. (Photo: Wolfram Huke)